December 9, 2025
Learn the difference between RPE (Rate of Perceived Exertion) and RIR (Reps in Reserve), how they map to each other, and when to use each method to train hard, progress consistently, and avoid burnout.
RPE and RIR are two sides of the same coin: both estimate how close you are to failure on a set.
RIR is usually easier for beginners and strength athletes, while RPE is slightly better for mixed goals and endurance work.
Whichever tool you choose, being consistent and honest matters far more than the specific scale you use.
This guide compares RPE and RIR based on four criteria: clarity (how easy they are to understand), usability in the gym (how simple they are to apply under fatigue), specificity (how precisely they target training stress), and versatility (how well they adapt across goals like strength, hypertrophy, and endurance). Recommendations are then tailored to lifter experience level and training context such as compound vs isolation exercises and barbell vs machine work.
Training intensity determines whether you gain strength and muscle, just maintain, or burn out. RPE and RIR are autoregulation tools that help you adjust effort based on how you feel that day instead of blindly following percentages. Understanding both lets you pick the tool that makes it easiest to train hard enough to progress without overshooting and getting injured or exhausted.
RPE is a 1–10 scale that describes how hard a set feels, based on your perception of effort and proximity to failure. In strength training, RPE is usually anchored to how many reps you had left in the tank. An RPE 10 means all-out: no reps left. RPE 9 means maybe one more rep was possible. RPE 7 usually means 3–4 reps in reserve. Lower RPE like 5–6 is easy to moderate work; 1–3 is mostly warm-up. The key is that RPE blends how close you are to failure with how heavy and fatiguing the load feels that day.
Great for
RIR directly answers one question: how many more reps could I have done with good form? If you finish a set of 8 squats and feel you could have done 2 more clean reps, that was 2 RIR. Zero RIR means you hit the last full rep you could possibly do with good technique. RIR can be used on an informal 0–4 scale for most work sets. It’s more literal than RPE and often easier to explain: just estimate remaining reps before technical failure, not absolute collapse.
Great for
RIR is concrete: you estimate remaining reps at the end of a set. That makes it intuitive for many lifters, especially in rep-based strength and hypertrophy work. It’s easy to say, "stop with 1–2 good reps in the tank." RIR is also simple to standardize across exercises and loads. For sets of 6–15 reps, most people can quickly get a feel for what 1–3 RIR feels like, especially on predictable machine or dumbbell lifts. This clarity is great for beginners and intermediate lifters who need to learn what "hard enough" actually feels like.
Great for
RIR gets less precise in very low rep (1–3) or very high rep (20+) ranges. On heavy singles, it is difficult to know if you truly had "1 more" in the tank, and fatigue or fear can skew perception. In long pump sets, rep speed slows and burn increases, making it hard to count possible extra reps. RIR also doesn’t directly capture how heavy or stressful a set feels beyond reps left; two sets with the same RIR can feel very different if you’re sleep-deprived or sore.
Great for
RIR is easier to grasp, and beginners need simple, concrete cues to learn real effort.
Great for
Intermediates can handle nuance; RIR keeps accessories simple, RPE adds flexibility on big lifts.
To use either scale well, you need a reference point. On safe exercises (e.g., leg press, machine rows, cable curls), occasionally perform a set to true technical failure with good form. Count the reps and note the feeling at the end. Then in the future, when you stop 2–3 reps earlier on similar movements, you’ll have a concrete sense of what 1–3 RIR or RPE 7–9 feels like. Do not do this routinely on risky compound lifts like barbell squats or deadlifts.
Great for
Flipping constantly between RPE and RIR makes it harder to get calibrated. Choose the language that feels most intuitive now (for many, RIR) and use it consistently for at least 8–12 weeks. Only then consider translating or layering the other system. Your main goal is honest, repeatable ratings so you can see patterns over time and adjust training stress intelligently.
Great for
RPE and RIR are functionally equivalent when calibrated well; the choice should be driven by what you can use most consistently and honestly in your own training context.
Both tools work best when combined with simple effort zones, occasional sets near true failure for calibration, and objective feedback like bar speed and performance trends.
Frequently Asked Questions
Both work well for hypertrophy as long as you train close enough to failure. Most research suggests that sets taken to about 0–3 reps in reserve produce similar muscle growth, regardless of whether you call that RPE 7–10. RIR is usually simpler for hypertrophy programming because it directly describes how close you are to failure in rep-based sets.
Yes. Many lifters implicitly do this by thinking in RIR but logging in RPE or vice versa. For example, you might aim for 2 RIR on a set and then record it as RPE 8. Just avoid overcomplicating things; pick one as your main language and only translate when helpful for communication or programming.
They do not need to be perfect; they just need to be consistent and close. Being off by one rep occasionally is normal. Over time, as you gain experience and occasionally test true failure on safe exercises, your estimates will improve. The bigger problems are chronic underestimation (always stopping too far from failure) or frequent overshooting (regularly taking high-risk lifts to 0 RIR).
Yes, but selectively. Going to 0 RIR is more appropriate on safer exercises like machines, cables, or some dumbbell movements, and even then it should be sprinkled in, not used on every set. On heavy compound barbell lifts, most lifters will progress better and stay healthier spending most time around 1–3 RIR (RPE 7–9), reserving true max efforts for testing phases or competition.
If detailed tracking adds stress, simplify. Use rough zones instead of exact numbers, like "easy," "moderate," and "hard but clean." You can also use external progression rules (e.g., add weight when all sets feel clearly submaximal) and only occasionally estimate RIR. The goal is better training decisions, not perfection in logging.
RPE and RIR are highly compatible ways of describing the same thing: how close you are to failure on a set. RIR is usually simpler for beginners and hypertrophy work, while RPE shines for advanced strength and conditioning where readiness fluctuates. Choose the tool that feels most natural, calibrate it with occasional sets near failure, and apply it consistently so you can train hard enough to progress without burning out.
Track meals via photos, get adaptive workouts, and act on smart nudges personalised for your goals.
AI meal logging with photo and voice
Adaptive workouts that respond to your progress
Insights, nudges, and weekly reviews on autopilot
In strength training, RPE and RIR are mathematically linked. A common mapping: RPE 10 = 0 RIR (no reps left); RPE 9.5 = 0–1 RIR; RPE 9 = 1 RIR; RPE 8 = 2 RIR; RPE 7 = 3 RIR; RPE 6 = 4+ RIR (warm-up / technique work). So logging a set as RPE 8 is almost the same as logging it as 2 RIR. The main difference is framing: RIR is stated in reps, RPE is on a 1–10 scale. Many coaches even program using one and mentally translate to the other depending on athlete preference.
Great for
RPE captures effort more holistically: how many reps you had left plus how heavy and taxing the load feels. This makes it useful when daily readiness fluctuates. For example, a weight that was RPE 7 last week might feel like RPE 9 after poor sleep; RPE tells you to back off or reduce weight. It is also widely used in powerlifting and endurance sports, so it can unify your language across barbell training, conditioning, and recovery work.
Great for
Because RPE includes overall difficulty, it can feel more subjective and abstract, especially early on. Two lifters with different pain tolerance might call the same set RPE 8 vs RPE 9. Lifters can also confuse “hard because I am tired today” with “hard because I am close to failure.” Without experience, RPE logs may drift and become inconsistent. And for people who like concrete cues, a 1–10 scale may feel less intuitive than "how many reps were left."
Great for
Great for
RPE captures global difficulty and readiness, crucial when lifting near maximal loads.
Great for
Muscle growth depends more on proximity to failure than exact load; RIR describes that directly.
Great for
RIR assumes discrete reps, which doesn’t map well to continuous efforts like running or cycling.
Great for
You don’t need to differentiate between 1.5 and 1.75 RIR. Think in simple zones: easy (4+ RIR, RPE 6 or less), moderate (3–4 RIR, RPE 7), hard but sustainable (1–2 RIR, RPE 8–9), and maximal (0 RIR, RPE 9.5–10). Program most work in the hard-but-sustainable zone, with some easier warm-up and technique work and occasional maximal sets on safe exercises. This reduces mental overhead while still giving strong autoregulation benefits.
Great for
Subjective tools are powerful, but even better when paired with objective data. Watch bar speed (either visually or with a simple velocity tracker), rep quality, and performance trends. If your RPE 8 squat doubles keep losing reps or slowing dramatically, you might be underestimating effort or accumulating fatigue. If RIR 2 sets feel easy and bar speed is snappy, you might have room to add weight.
Great for
